По­яс­не­ние.

Dear Jeremy,

Thank you for your last letter, it was great to hear some news from you!

I change my hobbies a lot, too. My new one is making beautiful postcards. It helps me to relax after a tough day and all my friends just love to receive my postcards! As for themselves, most of them do mountain biking as a hobby. I think that the most expensive hobbies are connected with travelling and sports, because plane tickets and hotels are expensive. And some sport equipment can be expensive too. In general, people need hobbies to express themselves in their own way. Sometimes people also trying to find hobbies to communicate with other people who are interested in the same things.

Anyway, you've mentioned your room. How is the redecoration going? Did you change your room completely? Is there more free space now?

I've got to go as my father is asking me to help him with his car.

Write back soon.

Best wishes,

Stephen

По­яс­не­ние. Чтобы успеш­но на­пи­сать вы­ска­зы­ва­ние с эле­мен­та­ми рас­суж­де­ния сле­ду­ет:

- стро­ить вы­ска­зы­ва­ния в со­от­вет­ствии с пред­ло­жен­ным пла­ном;

- на­чи­нать вве­де­ние с об­ще­го пред­став­ле­ния темы и пред­ло­же­ния, отоб­ра­жа­ю­ще­го ее про­блем­ный ха­рак­тер;

- во вве­де­нии не­об­хо­ди­мо пе­ре­фра­зи­ро­вать тему/про­бле­му, ис­поль­зуя си­но­ни­мич­ные вы­ра­же­ния;

- в ос­нов­ной части сна­ча­ла вы­ска­зать свое мне­ние и ар­гу­мен­ти­ро­вать его, затем пред­ста­вить точки зре­ния дру­гих людей и дать ар­гу­мен­та­цию, по­че­му с ними не со­глас­ны;

- при­во­дя контр­ар­гу­мен­ты, от­ста­и­вая свою точку зре­ния, же­ла­тель­но ис­поль­зо­вать пе­ри­фраз, си­но­ни­мию;

- в за­клю­чи­тель­ном аб­за­це еще раз ука­зать на про­блем­ный ха­рак­тер темы, по­ка­зать, что вы спо­соб­ны ви­деть и дру­гие точки зре­ния, тем не менее ваша ка­жет­ся вам более убе­ди­тель­ной;

- де­лить текст на аб­за­цы, ко­то­рые от­ра­жа­ют со­дер­жа­тель­ную и ло­ги­че­скую струк­ту­ру тек­ста;

- сде­лать вве­де­ние и за­клю­че­ние при­бли­зи­тель­но оди­на­ко­вы­ми по объ­е­му;

- раз­бить ос­нов­ную часть как ми­ни­мум на два аб­за­ца, при­бли­зи­тель­но оди­на­ко­вых по раз­ме­ру;

-сле­дить за тем, чтобы общий объем ос­нов­ной части был не мень­ше об­ще­го объ­е­ма вве­де­ния и за­клю­че­ния;

- осо­бое вни­ма­ние уде­лять сред­ствам ло­ги­че­ской связи тек­ста, как внут­ри пред­ло­же­ния, так и между пред­ло­же­ни­я­ми.

После вы­пол­не­ния за­да­ния уде­ли­те вни­ма­ние про­вер­ке и под­сче­ту ко­ли­че­ства слов (долж­но быть 200–250 слов).

При­мер со­чи­не­ния:

Today some people believe that pollution caused by human isn’t that significant. Others are convinced that we should be more careful because our technologies become dangerous to all the living creatures on Earth.

In my opinion, nature can’t resist to all the damage that people cause and you should keep in mind that progress never stops and the situation keeps getting worse until we do some measures concerning protection of nature. Moreover, there are thousands of factories around the world and they are harmful to all creatures living nearby. But the most dangerous thing is that ozone depletion caused by human interference could make all living organisms extinct.

But some people are convinced that we shouldn’t bother that much about nature. They believe that human aren’t powerful enough to cause any significant damage to things around them. They also say that we could keep exploiting natural resources and nothing bad will happen.

I disagree with this point of view because these people fail to understand that current technologies should be wisely used but most individuals aren’t responsible enough to do that. And people do cause damage to nature and there are scientific evidence telling us that.

Taking everything into consideration, there are two different points of view on that problem. I’m convinced that nature can’t resist forever and we should do some measure to improve the current situation.